Question: The US president George W Bush in 1991 called on deputies in the Ukrainian parliament to remain in the USSR and not declare independence from Moscow. It seems that even now the Democrats, Biden’s assistant Sullivan, the head of the CIA, Burns, are also trying to take into account the interest of the Kremlin by restraining US military assistance to Ukraine.
Is it the fear of chaos in Russia after the defeat of its aggression in Ukraine? And blocking aid in Congress by Trump and the Trumpists is essentially turning the Trumpists almost into a branch of Putin in the United States. Are congressmen really so afraid and dependent on the narcissistic Donald Trump not seeing an alliance of dictators, Russia, China, North Korea, Iran against democracies? Or is there more of a role here for the inner party’s struggle before the presidential election and Trump’s closeness to autocrats rather than democrats?
Answer from the Ascended Saint Germain through Kim Michaels. This answer was given during the 2024 Easter webinar
Well, certainly if you go back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, there was a rather considerable fear in the West of what would happen if Russia descended into chaos, potentially was split up into separate nations that had nuclear weapons. What would happen if some rogue leader decided to launch nuclear rockets from some territory in Eastern Russia, for example? You could say that this fear is still there to some degree because there are people who are projecting what could be potential outcomes.
You know, there are something called war games, but there are also people in various government institutions in the United States or in think tanks that are projecting what are some of the possible scenarios that could happen as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine. And one of those is, of course, that the Putin government could fall and there could be such chaos in Russia that it would be split up into separate nations. And then the question is, what would happen to the nuclear weapons, who would gain control of them and what might they decide to do with them?
There is a certain tendency among certain circles in the United States to think that a known enemy is better than an unknown. They think that they have some feeling for what the Soviet Union was like and what they would do and not do. And they also think they have the same with Putin and his government because they think they can gauge what limits they would abide by. And they think they would not go totally beyond the line and become completely irrational and launch a nuclear war, for example.
But they do not know if somebody else took over what they would do. Yes, there is a certain fear of the unknown that plays into this. And you can see, for example, that when the Soviet Union was dissolved, there was Western forces that talked the Ukrainian leaders into giving up their nuclear weapons and getting some security guarantee, which, of course, has now been violated because the Western nations did not come to the defense of Ukraine directly.
This is, of course, one concern. But this is not really what is causing the turmoil in the Republican Party. What is causing the turmoil in the Republican Party is that this party is now in an existential struggle for survival because there are still people who hold on to traditional Republican values. And then there is the Trump loyalists who are willing to disregard any traditional Republican values in order to follow Trump and whatever his whims may be at the moment, which could change tomorrow or next week.
And so there is an existential struggle for the survival of the Republican Party. And whatever the outcome may be, it is highly likely that the party either will dissolve or be split up into at least two factions. What could prevent this is Trump’s defeat in the election, which would cause some Republicans to say: “This is enough, we have had enough for Trump, we need to get back to functioning as the Republican Party.” But it is still possible that Trump could maintain some kind of loyal following that would want to carry on his policies, and there would still be a split. If Trump was re-elected, which at this point is a low probability, then the Republican Party would be forced to hold together probably during his period in office. But after he left office, there would still be a conflict that could split the party because Trump, if he was re-elected, would continue taking his government further and further away from Republican values. There are indeed Republicans who are much more in tune with my plans and my vision for America than the Trump loyalists, who are by and large not in tune with me at all, as of course Trump is not in attunement with me whatsoever.
I can work with some of these Republicans like Liz Cheney, Kinzinger and others, and I will attempt to work with them to maintain some sense of continuity in the Republican Party. But it is at this moment, not an easy thing to do. The main message I want to give here is that the Republican Party is right now in an existential struggle and its future is uncertain.
Copyright © 2024 Kim Michaels