Question: As President Biden stepped aside and Kamala Harris has become the nominee, I have sensed a shift in the energy level regarding this race. Many of us feel as if Kamala has energized the country to some extent and there is a growing movement to have America not go back to the old way that Trump and the MAGA folks want to go back to. In a previous answer, the masters had indicated their recommendation would be for Biden to run against Trump. Can the masters comment on the changed dynamics of the upcoming election? Is this energy, hope and excitement that we are feeling real or is it just in our head?
Answer from the Ascended Master Saint Germain through Kim Michaels. This answer was given during the 2024 Chicago Conference.
If I am to give a somewhat humorous answer, I would say that all politics is in your head. And, of course, from the ascended perspective we look at it in a different way. Now, it is true that when you go back to not so long ago, six months ago, a year ago, the situation as it was, meant that it was simply impossible to get any other candidates than Trump and Biden because the two parties were too locked. Naturally, I would have preferred two different candidates that were younger, that had a more open mind towards progress, however they could see it from their respective viewpoints. But it is clear that I would much prefer, not necessarily young inexperienced people, but younger people in politics. You see many countries around the world where it is more and more older people that are running the country, but you also see some countries where there are more and more young people coming up. And naturally, young people are more open to new ideas than older people. That is a general trend.
But it just was not realistic that either party in the United States would nominate a younger person, given how the situation was locked. That is why when it became obvious to more and more people that Biden’s health was failing, this was an opportunity to bring younger candidates in. And we, of course, generally support that. In fact, you could say that if either party had been more open they would have, in the last four years, groomed younger candidates to take over. But because Trump managed to create this hold on the Republican Party this was not possible. And when it became clear that he would most likely be the nominee for the Republicans, Biden felt an obligation to try to defeat him again as he had done before and many Democrats supported this because they thought this was the safe bet.
If there was something that the Democratic Party could have done more, it was to use the last four years to either groom other younger candidates or to promote Kamala Harris so she had more of a public profile. But, of course, you can always look back and say that by her not having a public profile there is more enthusiasm and optimism that perhaps she will be different. And that, of course, remains to be seen whether she is elected or whether she is able to move the country and the Democratic Party in a different direction, because there is a need to move the country in a different direction as I have said many times. Especially the issue of the income inequality where more and more wealth goes to the top two or ten percent. This is a very, very big issue in the United States. The Biden administration attempted to address it but have not done nearly enough. The question is, can the Democratic Party make this an issue because the Republicans are not likely to do it, certainly not under Trump.
Naturally there are many, many people around the country who have sensed that Biden and Trump were too locked in a certain approach to politics. And therefore, they have hoped for some younger people to step in, and now they see that at least the Democrats are giving a younger person a chance. Whether she will be the actual nominee or not, even though it looks likely now, it remains to be seen. There is a real optimism. There is a background or a reality to the optimism. But, of course, it all remains to be seen how this will play out. It will depend a lot on the approach that the Democrats take.
And if I were to make a recommendation, which of course is not likely to be listened to, it would be, take the focus away from Trump. Do not even comment on Trump. Do not even try to paint him in any particular way. Let him paint himself into a corner and focus on what you are going to do for the American people. Change the tone of the political debate. Speak with a different voice, a more compassionate voice, and let him continue to speak the way he speaks. Demonstrate the contrast. Do not try to beat him at his own game. Change the game. That would be my recommendation.
There are of course people who are tuned into my being even though they have no idea of the name Saint Germain. It remains to be seen whether they will be able to actually get this through or whether it will be the same kind of tone, the same kind of antagonistic confrontational tone that has demonstrated politics, certainly since Trump arrived at the scene, but even before going back to the 1990s where the Republicans decided to be more confrontational, basically be more epic about politics. Because the shift into painting American politics in these epic terms certainly can be traced back to the Republican Party and they bear the majority of the responsibility for it, but of course the Democrats have gone into it and have reinforced the trend, so there is a certain karma on both sides.
I very much would like to see, as we have said before, to change the political debate, change the tone, change the entire approach where you are not making other groups of people responsible for all of the problems of the nation, where you realize that there are some dynamics with the power elite that are not being addressed, have not been addressed, but you do not demonize them. You do not say that they are the cause of all the problems because you acknowledge that in a democracy, all people must contribute in a positive way and those who criticize and those who demonize and those who single out other people as the problem, they are actually in an anti-democratic mindset and they cannot further America as a democratic nation. And let me assure you that regardless of what might be said out there on both sides, America will remain a democracy. It will remain a democracy. But how much the people are influencing it versus now where the power elite has a disproportionate influence on a democracy, that is what remains to be seen.
Copyright © 2024 Kim Michaels