Question: Former CIA operative Adam Zarnowski wrote in his book Jormungandr that the 2024 election was stolen and that Kamala Harris would have won the election. Was the 2024 US election rigged to favor Donald Trump?
Answer from the Ascended Master Saint Germain through Kim Michaels. This answer was given during the 2025 USA Conference.
The answer is no. The people who showed up on election day and voted, their votes were counted accurately, and Donald Trump got more votes than Kamala Harris. That is the fact.
You will, of course, as some of you have realized, see how in the 2020 election, there were those who claimed that the election was stolen in favor of Biden and that Trump had actually won. And it happens to be some of the same people, at least. But you see here, the United States has a fairly accurate election system that is overseen by some dedicated people and even international observers. It is generally recognized that there are not problems that would reverse the result of the election. And that is what I can tell you from the Ascended Realm.
Now, you can always debate whether the campaign favored a certain candidate or not. But that is a very complicated issue where you can say that the previous administration, when a president is seeking re-election, has a very big impact on how the public perceives that administration. President Biden did not do a very good job of promoting himself during the four years he was in office, and that set the stage for Trump, who with his negativity could come in and make it seem like Biden had not done enough, whereas Biden had actually done quite a lot. But he did not really let people know that.
You can go back to 2020 and say: ”Well, if Trump had been as good of a self-promoter as he claims to be, he had four years to promote himself so he could be sure to be re-elected.” Obviously, he did not do a good enough job there either. But you also have to look at that the American people are in an unrealistic state of mind for most of them. And we have talked about it before: they have this view that the president is like a godlike figure who can solve all problems. But that is not the case because the Constitution limits the powers of the president.
The American people look for any new president to be able to do what no president has done before. And then after four years, they realize: “Oh, this president could not do what no president has been able to do before either. Let’s try another guy. Maybe he can do it.” There is always that dynamic.
You can debate whether the media was more prejudiced towards Trump. You can say that Trump took advantage of the people’s dissatisfaction with Biden and made all these inaccurate statements about the disastrous things that Biden had done, and people believed it, and so forth. But the fact of the matter is that the election was not decided by the people who showed up to vote; it was decided by the people who did not show up to vote.
You really have to look at why did not those people show up? Is it perhaps because they are dissatisfied with the current political system that is so gridlocked into two camps, Republicans and Democrats? Is there a need to break this up by perhaps allowing a third party? And does it perhaps take a person with a humongous ego and a humongous bank account to bankroll such a party? Or is it just going to all fall apart and not happen?
The interesting question here really is, can there be someone, either in one of the existing parties or a new party, who can change the dynamic in the political debate and speak to those voters who are seeing that the current system is not working for the people? And will they then become more engaged so that they will show up and vote? And will that change the dynamic in two years, first of all, and in four years also?
But again, the whole idea that the election was physically rigged and that certain votes were not counted or that false votes were entered into the system is simply an unfounded conspiracy theory. I might also interject here that taking what a former or current CIA operative says is not the wisest approach, because the entire purpose of the CIA is propaganda, is distorting reality. And it is to the point where most of the people who have worked for the CIA for a long time cannot tell the difference—they have “drunk their own Kool-Aid.”
Copyright © 2023 Kim Michaels