Question: At the beginning of the war in Ukraine, the ascended masters said that the exit ban for men was necessary, (that men could not leave Ukraine), as otherwise the country would have no one left to defend it. However, that resulted in further human rights violations within Ukraine itself, particularly forced mobilization. Men are abducted from the streets, subjected to torture, killed and extorted for money. Can you explain what positive outcome this has brought for Ukraine? And why do other nations remain silent about such blatant violations of citizens’ rights and freedoms?
Answer from the Ascended Master Saint Germain through Kim Michaels. This answer was given during the 2025 Holland Conference.
What would be the alternative to leave Ukraine undefended so it would be overrun by Russia? Do you think that if Ukraine had been taken over by Russia in the first weeks of the war, as was Russia’s plan, do you think this would have resulted in no human rights violations for the Ukrainian people? There were plans by the Russians to abduct up to a million Ukrainians, take them to concentration camps in Russia for ‘re-education’. This is obviously one of these situations that from an ascended perspective we would rather have avoided but since this situation was created by Russia, forced upon Ukraine, then Ukraine has the choice of either submitting, letting itself be subjected to whatever the Russians would do or resisting.
Ukraine has chosen to resist and therefore, they need to do whatever is necessary. Somebody has to go to the front lines if Ukraine is to survive as an independent nation. It is, of course, a very non-constructive choice that the Ukrainian leaders had to make. The only alternative would have been total surrender and I can assure you that the human rights violations that would have been committed by the Russians if they had taken over Ukraine would have been far worse than what you have seen so far.
Copyright © 2025 Kim Michaels